AP STUDIO ART
Breadth Drawing
DRAWING BREADTH
Look for engagement with a range of:
• Light
and Shade • Rendering of Form
• Composition
• Surface Manipulation
• The
Illusion of Depth • Mark-making
Form Content
Tonal Values Line Quality
Perspective
and Other Spatial Systems Composition
Drawing
Surface Depth
Means of
Representation and Abstraction Pattern
Materials
Techniques Styles and so on …
Concept 1 Engagement with drawing
issues.
6
The work demonstrates serious,
successful engagement with a broad range of drawing issues.
5
The work demonstrates engagement with a broad range of drawing issues.
4
The work demonstrates engagement with a reasonable range of drawing issues.
3
The work demonstrates engagement with a superficial range of drawing issues.
2
The work demonstrates little engagement with a range of drawing issues.
1
The range of drawing issues addressed is extremely limited.
Concept 2 Stylistic as well as
technical concerns
6
The work demonstrates command of
stylistic as well as technical concerns.
5 A
range of stylistic as well as technical drawing concerns is evident in the
work.
4 Technical
skill in drawing is generally competent.
3 Technical
skill in drawing is uneven and/or variable.
2 Solutions
to the range of problems attempted may be simplistic.
1 Engagement
with drawing issues is questionable and/or lacking.
Concept 3 Confidence and Attitude
towards work
6 The
work is executed with confidence.
5 The
quality of the work is strong.
4 The
work is generally good quality; it’s success may be somewhat variable.
3 There
may be a sense of experimentation, without a completely competent resolution or
exploration of what is being attempted.
2 Technical
skill in drawing is limited. Drawing tends to be awkward.
1 Technique
is clumsy and/or inept.
Concept 4 Evidence of Thinking
6 The
work shows flexibility of thinking, as evidenced in the variety of works presented.
5 The
works shows clear decision making, there is evidence of thinking.
4 There
is evidence of thinking in at least some of the works.
3 There
is modest evidence of thinking/decision making in the work.
2 Evidence
of thinking may be slight or present in only a few works.
1 There
is little, if any, evidence of thinking/decision making.
Concept 5 Form and Content
6
Form and content are effectively synthesized to communicate visual ideas.
5
The link between form and content are strong.
4
There is some relationship between form and content.
3
The relationship between form and content is unclear.
2
There is little apparent relationship between form and content.
1
Form, material, and content are unconsidered.
Concept 6 Materials
6 A
variety of materials are used effectively.
5 A
range of materials is used, in most cases successfully.
4
The work may demonstrate strong-to excellent breadth of drawing issues but be
of less than good quality.
3 There
may be experimentation, without a completely competent resolution or
exploration of what is being attempted.
2
Some works may be of moderate quality but do not address a range of drawing
issues.
1
Not enough work is presented to demonstrate breadth.
Concept 7 Experimentation,
Risk-Taking, Ambition.
6
Most work demonstrates experimentation,
risk-taking, and/or ambition.
5
The work may include some excellent pieces but address less than a strong range
of drawing issues.
4 The
work may be of strong or excellent
quality, without demonstrating breadth of experience.
3 There
may be a sense of experimentation, without a completely competent resolution or
exploration of what is being attempted.
2
Some works may be of moderate quality but do not address a range of drawing
issues.
1
Not enough work is presented to demonstrate breadth or the images are virtually
impossible to see.
Concept 8 Quality
6 Overall,
the work is of excellent quality.
5
Overall, the work is of strong
quality.
4
Overall, the work is of good quality.
3 Overall,
the work is of moderate quality.
2
Overall, the work is of weak quality.
1 Overall,
the work is of poor quality.
